Update

I’ve been busy with the shift of focus, towards shorter term trading. I advised recently that a poor year for commodities threatens my year end PnL, so pending the validation or invalidation of solar cycle and demographic theories, I am taking action to try to ensure a good year-end figure. What this means in practice is (i) taking profits on markets where applicable (ii) using shorter term indicators and leverage to bring other positions to profit and then close out and (iii) as the range of markets I am involved in narrows, attacking the remaining markets, plus (iv) trading in and out of other opportunities where I see them. So I am gradually reducing the range of markets I am involved in whilst leveraging up on the remaining markets: a combination of decreasing and increasing exposure to keep risk levels satisfactory. And no longer term strategic positioning any more – that will be resumed following this exercise. It’s an enjoyable challenge, as I haven’t used this approach for some time. No guarantee of success though, and only in the early stages.

It remains to be seen whether the solar peak is ahead or behind us, and if it is ahead of us whether the anticipated correlated commodities peak will occur. It is also still not yet clear whether commodities are changing trend into an uptrend, or still in a bear market since 2011. Below, both commodities index and sunspots versus Sp500.

8oct20131

8oct20132Similarly unclear yet is whether equities are in a cyclical topping process. We see breadth divergences, but not yet deterioration in leading indicators. We see the kind of price oscillation within a range that would mark a top, but as yet no real marked shift in sector performance that would be typical of a top. By my demographic work, we should tip into another global recession and equities bear in due course, but it would be historically typical if this was triggered by tightening: bond yields rise too far (not yet there) or government cuts back on spending/stimulus. On the latter, the US government shutdown, if prolonged, threatens to do the equivalent job of reducing government spending; or the government may agree to spending cuts to raise the debt ceiling (deadline Oct 17th); or the Fed may taper QE (next FOMC output Oct 30th). The near term prospect of a taper looks less likely with the government shutdown potentially shaving off GDP, but it remains out there as unknown, and on that note, commodities typically perform historically (as shown in the first chart above) once equities have topped and the economy has topped, once rate cuts are underway. Clearly that isn’t our current scenario, which adds to the uncertainty over commodities. Plus, again referring to demographics, we have an unprecedented collective global downtrend in place which could potentially overwhelm any possible commodities/inflation rally. Which brings me back to the start: nothing has been validated or invalidated yet in terms of solar, demographic, commodities, equities, bond yields and government spending/stimulus. Gradually developments in all these areas will make it clear, but pending that, my focus is making money shorter term.

So to the near term. Below I show the position of the SP500: at support in a rising wedge. That rising wedge could spell a breakdown ahead, but first a bounce may be in order.

8oct20133The US government shutdown and debt ceiling uncertainty is affecting market sentiment, but news of a likely agreement could at any point provide a relief rally. If the impasse remains however, then the next two weeks are the negative lunar period which takes us up to the debt ceiling deadline and could therefore keep downward pressure on stocks.

Below is the latest geomagnetic-lunar model versus the commodities index. The geomagnetic trend has flattened out and has a positive edge looking out over the next 3 weeks. Indeed we are into the last quarter of the year, where we typically see more benign geomagnetism and positive seasonality for pro-risk (which I believe are correlated). If equities are not yet making a cyclical top, then there is both a backdrop and a time window in which to rally away from the price range of the last few months.

8oct20134The US dollar is flirting with major breakdown, but arrives there oversold and overbearish. A breakdown would add weight to a commodities rally, so I continue to watch. Crude oil is typically the main driver of an inflationary commodities rally and looks to have formed a short term low over the last couple of sessions. I am watching that too, as further drops back into the range of the last couple of years would cast doubt on commodities making a meaningful uptrend.

*Updated short term lunargeomagnetic model versus SP500 10 Oct*:

8oct20135

Demographics In Play

Demographics may be a long term theme but I believe it very much has relevance in trying to work out what’s next for the markets.

US demographics turned around 2000. Here we see US GDP changed trend around the same time, and with US demographics negative for this decade, that trend should continue. To be clear there are large oscillations within that but the overall pressure is down.

25sep20131Source: Scott Grannis

Here is my demographic (weighted) composite again for the main 5 economies of the world.

5May20131

And here is real global GDP, which again matches the trends in global demographics (represented by the line overlaid):

25sep20132Source: TheNextRecession

In short, the demographic trend is recessionary, and I believe the global economy will at some point get the trigger or catalyst to tip into negative growth again, either through excessive bond yield rising tightening or through excessive commodity price rises, which would be a temporary inflationary shock. I say temporary as I previously also showed the relation between demographics and inflation/deflation which show the trend in place now is price deflationary:

https://solarcycles.net/2013/06/23/demographics-disinflation-and-deflation/

“A swell of people aged 15-20 entering the workforce works up price inflation through spending, whereas more people entering old age relative to the work force is disinflationary through saving and disinvestment.”

The Fed is targeting 2.5% inflation, but the demographics say this is unlikely to be achieved. Also, GDP is going to remain weak and central banks are going to need to maintain intervention.

The latest US inflation rate came in at 1.5% annually. This is lower than most current treasury yields. The Fed wants inflation to be higher than yields in order to reduce its ballooning debt (by inflating away). Bond yields may still be historically low, but the demographic trends in place mean that inflation is low and growth is low. It wants to stop yields rising to 3% for fear that this level would be enough to tip a weak economy and to prevent it entering a deflationary trap where bond yields exceed inflation. Indeed the Fed’s Bullard has said that if inflation dropped to 1% annual he would want QE to be increased.

Which brings us to commodities. Can they rally? The demographics are largely against, as demand should erode and hard assets perform best in inflationary trends. On the flip side, the easy money conditions mean a loss of appetite for stocks could see money flows into commodities in a speculative momentum rally. History would suggest they probably can as late cyclicals, but history has not seen this collective demographic downtrend before between most of the major economies.

If I was to advise on a buy-and-hold portfolio for the next few years (I am not an advisor, don’t follow me etc) it would look something like this: long japan equities (positive demographics for stock market), short usa/europe/china equities (negative demographics), long gold (go-to asset as anti-demographic), short energy, short real estate, long cash with bias to asia currencies (all deflationary).

Russell Napier believes that there is trend-following in place in equities currently, but that eventually perception will turn to how QE and ZIRP have failed over 4 years to return the US to normal growth and stocks will turn bearish. I agree that this will happen and see developments ahead that can force it. If the US pulls back on government spending (debt ceiling 30 Sept) or stimulus then earnings should decrease (as per recent post) and yields should rise further, respectively. If commodities make a speculative rally they are likely to tip the weak economy over, and if they continue to decline in a deflationary trend then US inflation is likely to fall yet further beneath bond yields. In short, the Fed is in a trap, and it is a demographic trap, and a particularly potent trap because of the collective demographic downtrends amongst most developed countries, making for a downward global pressure. I don’t believe it can create sustained inflation or normal growth UNTIL demographic trends change. Collective demographics do start to improve once we get to the end of this decade, but over the next couple of years I believe there is really no way to avoid a global recession and harsh nominal stocks bear. Either yields, commodities, reduced goverment intervention or increased government intervention should tip a fragile economy over.

What does that mean for trading? Well, for me personally, I like to play an asset one way, siding with the longer term trend. If it goes against me nearer term, then I can use money management and averaging, with the conviction the longer term trend will ultimately drive it. So my anchoring would look something like that imaginary buy-and-hold portfolio I posted just above. Right now I am long energy (oil and gas commodities) which is a concern if deflationary trends dominate. However, solar cycles / historic topping order / easy money speculative conditions may yet deliver the decisive rally that I seek, so I’m going to carry on holding for now. With equities I am looking to build on the short side from the current position but am looking for more evidence of stocks topping. The technical action of the last few days has added weight to this, but we still don’t have ‘enough’ all round evidence. But this is trying to be as accurate as possible with timing, for the yearly trading P&L. I have sold my other longer term equity-related investments over the last couple of months and moved them to cash.

Weekend Research Pt2

1. MORE ON CRUDE OIL

Here is a chart from Barry Bannister showing the impact of previous sharp moves higher in oil prices:

15sep1Source: Stifel

He suggests it is not the real oil price level per se but a ‘shock’ i.e. a big, fast move up in price that brings about a collapse in GDP.

Here is the nominal view of crude:

15sep3Source: FRED

From a technical perspective, the potential for such a swift rise is there, as crude has broken out of its triangular consolidation to the upside. A break above the 2011 high of $115, which is within reach, could be enough to produce the speculative spiral that has been behind previous parabolic rises.

Zooming in on the nearer term, a fairly messy range has developed over the last six weeks, with the contract buffeted about over Syria. With inventories still above historical averages it could be interpreted that there is a lack of appetite to buy higher than this range, and clearly there is a risk that this stalling in momentum gives way to a breakdown.

15sep4Source: Stockcharts

However, for now, the price continues to edge upwards and a bullish intraday reversal candle formed on Friday. So let’s see what happens this week.

2. DEMOGRAPHICS, TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION AND CORPORATE PROFITS

What if exponential technological evolution more than offsets negative demographics? I.e. what if rising corporate profits thanks to technology-driven gains can spur the stock market higher, maybe exponentially higher?

Here are US corporate profits, which seem to suggest that could be happening:

15sep5Source: FRED

Now take a look at wages as a percentage of US GDP:

15sep6Source: Business Insider / FRED

The employment to population ratio has also fallen sharply. Companies are making more profits but employing less people and paying them less. Technology is one key factor in this: it is cheaper and more efficient for companies to increasingly employ tech over people. As we are concerned with the stock market, are the corporate profits what matter? Well, more unemployment and lower incomes means lower demand in the economy. Hence we have seen a consistent theme in recent earnings seasons of revenues disappointing versus earnings: companies not making profits through demand but through cost savings.

But now take a look at what has been to a large part responsible for the recent rises in corporate profits to all-time highs:

15sep7Source: Pyramis

It is the government defecit. Government ‘spending’ (stimulus programmes, cutting overnight lending rate to banks to zero, etc) has been the major factor since the 2008 crisis in pushing up corporate profits. Those corporate profits are real, but at the expense of increasing public debt. So the US government wants to cut back QE when it can, and facing the debt ceiling again – another ‘fiscal cliff’ – it needs to cut back spending and make savings. It also wants to keep rates low, ideally lower than inflation, to reduce debt servicing and shrink the debt, so current rising yields are a threat. Extracing from that Richard Koo PDF again, Japan only fell into deflation once it had fallen off the fiscal cliff, following an attempted fiscal consolidation.

Additionally, drawing together several pieces of research, it turns out corporate profit levels are only important in stock market returns over long timescales, e.g. a 10 year view. Sentiment is the main market driver in any one year, and p/es are the main driver if trading say on a 2-3 year timescale. By my work p/es are relative to demographics. A p/e of 20 is not expensive if the demographic trends are strong and positive, and vice versa.

So, I can now come back to the opening question of whether tech evolution can push up corporate profits and in turn the stock market, and offset weak demographics. Tech can enable cost-cutting but this can be at the expense of people, resulting in lower demand in the economy, so it’s not just a simple win, it cuts both ways. Furthermore, recent record high corporate profits are shown to be mainly due to a transfer of wealth (debt) from the Government, and the risk to future earnings is in Government action to cut back QE and savings to deal with the debt ceiling. But ultimately, corporate profits don’t matter so much for the stock market, only in long term investing. Sentiment can push the market one way or the other ‘irrationally’ before p/es and demographics come into play, before corporate profits.

In summary, I am still of the opinion that we do not have a new ‘secular’ bull market in stocks underway and that once ‘sentiment’ gives way, the collective demographic downdraft will help topple the economy and stock market. Action on QE and in response to the debt ceiling could be a catalyst for future corporate profit disappointment, which could help tip the sentiment. Crude oil, meanwhile, could do the job all on its own, if ‘some development’ provides the impetus for a speculation move into the commodity. Exponential technological evolution is a real phenomenon and I believe is ‘the great hope’ for humans to deal with the debt, resource scarcity, global wierding, demographics, overpopulation and other challenges. But I don’t see evidence that it can drive the stock market ever higher versus these phenomena in the shorter term.

Weekend Research

Time for a more in-depth post.

1. SOLAR CYCLES

By my work the secular (more accurately demographic or anti-demographic) asset class should be bid to a peak in a solar-inspired speculation blow-off close to the solar maximum, which for this solar peak should be commodities to round off a decade long (plus) bull market. If the smoothed solar max has passed and was Feb 2012 and the CCI commodities index made its ultimate peak April/May 2011 then neither should now be exceeded. If this turns out to be the case in hindsight, once the solar max has been agreed, then the commodities peak would have occurred 9 months prior to the solar peak and would within normal parameters to continue to validate the theory.

24sep3

Source: Gary Tanashian / Stockcharts

If, alternatively, the solar peak is ahead late 2013 into early 2014 (which is SIDC’s second option, and also Leif Svalgaard’s prediction – shown below), then that 2011 CCI peak is too far away and if the theory is correct we should get another commodities peak closer to the solar peak, which would mean a higher peak in the CCI ahead. We have the possible seed for this in a fledgling CCI uptrend following a base established in July/Aug 2013 together with their historic performance as late cyclicals in what is possibly a cyclical topping process in equities occurring. However, this CCI uptrend is currently tentative, devoid of momentum and without broad participation thus far. The dips in oil and precious metals at the end of this week cast further doubt for now, but their drops coincided with money flowing back into equities. If equities are in a topping process then money should flow back to commodities in due course as they go outperform as late cyclicals. I would suggest the higher peak in CCI to be possible as speculative money pours in, under these easy money conditions globally. ZIRP and QE may not be able to generate growth but they can generate bubbles.

24sep4Source: Leif Svalgaard / WattsUpWithThat

If the first alternative turns out correct, and both the solar peak and commodities peak are behind us, then historically we have seen a new long term bull market in equities underway at this point, and the current easy money conditions could spell big momentum into equities (which would be the polar opposite to the second alternative of equities in a new bear and commoditites sharply rising, thus vital to call correctly). However, my demographic research shows that this is unlikely to be the case, at least not yet, as the positive demographic support for a new global secular stocks bull is absent. Indeed, the collective demographic trends of the major economies, bar Japan, are in an unprecedented collective downtrend.

2. DEMOGRAPHICS

This brings me to the question of whether central bank policy actions have been aggressive and potent enough to compensate for demographic headwinds. If that were to be the case then perhaps an enduring stocks bull and sticking economic growth could be achieved, albeit only whilst ZIRP and QE are maintained. I can very much recommend a read of the next link, which nicely summarises what QE can and can’t do and what Japan’s most-aggressive-to-date QE is likely to achieve:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/137092515/Richard-Koo-Quantitative-and-Qualitative-Easing-2013-04-16

In a nutshell, QE and ZIRP aren’t that potent as they cannot force people and companies to borrow or spend or invest. In the 1990s Japan tried to offset demographic downtrends with QE and ultra low rates and other stimulus tools. Even though most of the major economies were in demographic uptrends in that period (with booming asset markets and economies), this positive global environment AND these central bank actions were not enough to get people and companies to borrow, spend or invest.

I have overlaid the overall US demographic trend against Doug Short’s real US GDP growth chart here:

24sep1

Underlying Source: Dshort

The yellow dots reveal that real US GDP is currently lower than any previous recession start point. I suggest this shows the relative impotence of QE and ZIRP, and would argue that the demographic downtrend which should be in place for the bulk of this decade, suggests that real GDP growth level should fall negative again in the near future and another recession kick in. The question is whether this occurs with or without the tipping help of a speculative rally in commodities.

Here is the same for Japan: real GDP growth versus overall demographic trend.

24sep2Underlying Source: Economonitor

By demographics, Japan should be able to nurse along positive real GDP growth for the next few years. It should also be able to succeed in stopping price deflation:

23jun10Source: Andrew Cates

Note that both should be feasible by demographics alone, without ‘Abenomics’. The demographic trends for Japan mean that we should see underlying growth, price stabilisation, and rising asset markets, which I believe will be touted as positive results of Abenomics when in fact largely written by the demographic change of trend.

3. JAPANESE EQUITIES

So is Japan a buy? Not all recent economic data has been supportive, but manufacturing and service PMIs are indeed in runs of positive growth, revealing underlying economic improvement. The Yen and Japanese bonds both dropped sharply following the launch of Abenomics but have since retraced some. However, the Yen now appears to have broken down out of a bear flag, whilst Japanese bond yields are shaping for a higher low and a potential push on from there. The Nikkei also consolidated following the big run up earlier in the year, but has now broken upwards out of two consolidation patterns shown:

24sep6The line you can see coming into picture at the very top is the 2-decade declining resistance, the containment of the long term bear. I believe a retest of this should be on the cards and I have decided to add to playing Japan equities on the long side. However, if US equities are in a multi-month topping process and soon to enter a new cyclical bear market, then I would not expect Japanese equities to go their own way, only rather to relatively outperform, which would mean decline less. Nonetheless, a new bull market in Japanese equities is belated relative to demographics and I feel happy here trying to make profits on the long side – expecting any downside is more limited than other markets – whilst still trying to assess where US and global stocks are headed. The supporting evidence for Japanese equities to rise should come in real GDP, real economic improvement, and indeed an underlying bid in Japanese risk asset markets. So I will continue to watch the data releases.

4. USA

So back to the US. Here is the latest picture for ECRI leading indicator growth:

24sep7Source: Dshort / ECRI

ECRI leading indicator growth fell beneath zero prior to each recession shown in grey. The break into the negative often historically occurred close to the stock market topping, with stocks typically being a leading indicator of the economy. We can see there have been several breaks beneath zero that did not give way to a recession, not least the fairly deep fall in 2011 that helped ECRI (incorrectly) announce a recession. However, my take on the current reading of 4.1 is that we should see this fall towards zero if we are to see a cyclical bear erupt in equities and a recession to occur ahead. This growth measure has been in a declining trend since early 2013, so to add weight to an equities top being formed, we should continue to see this dropping. For now though, this leading indicator, and other leading indicators (such as Recession Alert or Conference Board) point to continued economic growth into year-end.

Weak but sustained growth and low rates are typically a good environment for equities, which would be a framework for equities to move higher and reveal the consolidation since May as digestion in an ongoing cyclical bull. In supportive of this, the Nasdaq is now convincingly at new highs for this cyclical bull, and the Dax is back testing its high-to-date (which is also the all-time nominal high). If other indices break up and away from the ‘topping range’ then we would be looking to 2014 for a cyclical top as a multi-month topping process would have to start over. As noted in a recent post we have some evidence for a topping process in play since May, but also some normal signs missing. This should be resolved one way or the other soon.

5. COMMODITIES AND BONDS

Which brings me to the two main threats to the economy and the equities cyclical bull: excessive inflation from sharp rises in commodity prices and/or excessive tightening from rising rates in escalating bond yields. Bond yields in the major economies continue to rise albeit from low levels. If economic growth persists further and the Fed begins to taper QE then we could expect yields to continue to rise. Historically, the tipping point has been when 10 year treasury yields hit 6%, however today’s demographic and debt interest pressures mean that trouble level is likely to be lower.

Regarding commodities, the most important is oil, as quick major escalations in oil prices have historically correlated with tipping the economy into recession, due to its importance as an input in so many processes. Despite the slack and weakness in the global economy, crude prices have hung around the $100 level the last 3 years. A speculative move into this asset, for any number of reasons, could under current easy money conditions swiftly lead to $125 oil, which I believe would really test a demographically-challenged weak global economy.

On the flip side, the same demographic trends could further erode commodity demand and also limit the exit from bonds. Further commodity price drops, together with yields stabilising relatively low, would again provide the backdrop for equities to march on and economic growth to persist – unless the potency of the collective demographic downtrends drag the economy down into recession on their own.

If Martin Pring’s normal historic topping order is playing out, then we have seen the top in bonds already, we should now see evidence of equities topping and of a transfer in momentum to commodities which should make a peak last as the economy rolls over. This would imply yields and commodities rise despite demographics, and for my work this would be a better fit if the solar peak were still ahead at the turn of 2013/14, with commodities making a final and bigger peak in the months around that.

I believe evidence in support of or against this could become clearer as soon as next week, watching the markets’ reactions to the FOMC output. Some mild tapering is being widely touted as a done deal, but the size and the wording we don’t know. Regardless, I expect a big reaction in the markets and it will be telling how commodities, precious metals and the US dollar, fare afterwards. If commodities are going to make a final big rally then the tentative uptrend of the last couple of months should cement and a US dollar breakdown out of its long term triangle (see HERE) would be a great partner for such a development.

6. TRADING

We are over 3/4 of the way through the year and my PnL is currently showing my worst year of performance to date since going full time, due to the run against commodities longs this year, particularly precious metals. This would repair itself if commodities did begin an uptrend in the last couple of months and now continue into year end, but it could yet go worse if they are in a bear market since 2011 and have further falls ahead. So I have decided to use the Autumn to do what I can to make sure of a good result by year-end. This means I am going to add shorter term trading to my game in this period, whilst running the more medium-term-focused global macro positions. Short trades are something I’ve done before, but not for some time due to success (and personal preference) with the longer term methods. So, I just wanted to share with you that this is what I’m going to be doing different. I am looking for liquid markets that I can play more aggressively for quick gains. So I am looking for candidates amongst the major markets that I can play confidently repeatedly either long or short (i.e. fundamentals/technicals align in favour of one way or the other), and this will include increasing exposure if movement goes the other way. One such play-thing is going to be the Nikkei on the long side, as mentioned above. I am going to pour over some other markets (stock indices, commodities, fx) to find others that I consider suitable, so will share when I decide. You may disagree with my choices and indeed the method, but I’m just sharing what I’m doing, and will let you know the results.

One last thing. Almost all my money is in sterling and I am looking to transfer this to Euros, now I am in Austria. The EUR-GBP exchange rate has therefore become part of my daily watch. A one cent movement in either direction makes a massive difference when considering the amount I am going to be transferring and getting this ‘right’ is as important as my other trading, in terms of the impact on my wealth. So I’ll share my current thoughts, but if any reader is more of a regular in the FX market, please step forward and share your knowledge.

EURGBP has been in a large declining channel since the start of 2009, with the last 3 year snippet shown below. In July of this year the Euro tried to break out, as the Eurozone recovery became more apparent, but it turned out to be a fake-out, and recently UK economic data has surprised to the upside, which has helped not only turn it back down into the channel but also break down beneath the rising Euro support shown. The Pound is fairly overbought now versus the Euro and EURGBP spent last week trying to base. However on Friday there was a further breakdown in favour of the Pound, taking the pair beneath 84. The latest UK inflation data is out this coming week which should influence the pair one way or another, however I believe that ultimately the Euro can drop further here against the Pound, given the technical developments and the change in the fundamental backdrop, and I’m going to hold out for 82- at this point and will review.

24sep8

Updates

Latest OECD leading indicator updates show a healthy picture globally. Emerging markets continue to trail advanced economies but the picture is improving for them. Macro economic data for China yesterday beat expectations and Chinese, Indian and Brazilian stock indices have all risen sharply in the last couple of weeks. Rather than advanced economies joining emerging economies in weakness, we have been seeing the opposite, with emerging markets beginning to join advanced economies in strength. This should continue forwards as evidenced in the overall G7+E7 narrow money leading indicator picture no longer showing weakening around year end:

11sep20133Source: Moneymovesmarkets

Which brings me to the big question of whether central banks can offset negative demographic trends in the advanced economies, and this is the subject of a new paper from the IMF (click HERE to read, hat tip Gary). They conclude that demographics do indeed affect unemployment and inflation and central bank policy therefore has to be more aggressive and more unorthodox to offset this. Holding rates at zero and running large QE programmes could be deemed aggressive (in the former) and unorthodox (in the latter). If these actions and collective central bank actions across the globe have offset demographics ‘enough’ then we ought to see enduring strength in coincident and leading data. Regarding coincident data, US economic surprises have broken upwards and are strong positive (whilst emerging markets have been steadily rising and are now just beneath zero). This picture could provide the grounds for a reduction in QE at next week’s FOMC output.

If the Fed tapers, then we could see precious metals further punctured, the US dollar rise, and treasury yields jump further. The twin threats to the economy are rising yields and rising commodity prices, particularly oil. Yesterday the softer line on Syria produced a pullback in oil and precious metals, however the recent evidence has been for a shift in outperformance towards commodities and emerging markets, which would be in line with a cyclical topping process in equities. If I am correct about the cyclical top in progress, then we should see commodities quickly come back, regardless of Syria, and energy stocks and materials stocks lead the way in this new leg up in stocks. Below I show the SP500 and the last two cyclical bull topping processes. The new upleg we are seeing now in stocks should be contained within the boxed range, if this is a top.

11sep20132

Meanwhile on gold, the GLD ETF shows a fairly tidy picture. Either gold has been turned away at resistance in a continued declining trend, or it is shaping up for an inverse head and shoulder pattern with an obvious horiztontal support. Resolution one way or the other should occur soon.

11sep20131 Source: Stockcharts

The Nasdaq has broken out and the Dax is flirting with new highs. Marginal new highs would befit a topping process, breakaway would not. I still give higher probability to an overall multi-month topping process due to evidence recently presented (such as breadth divergence, transfer to late cyclicals, technical shaping), however if leading indicators stay strong and early cyclicals regain momentum or other such developments, then I would be open to cyclical bull continuation. However, I maintain that rising yields and/or escalating commodity prices are more-potent-than-usual threats to the global economy due to the particular demographic-related fragility. Strong leading and coincident data as we are seeing can push up yields and commodities, and this is what I expect to continue. Neither have risen enough so far to put the economy at tipping point.

Trading-wise I am sat on my hands at the moment. I await to see whether oil and gold can resume advances following yesterday’s puncturing. I believe equities can rise further towards the top of the range so do not yet want to take long profits or add to short positions. I await the FOMC output next week and more importantly the market’s reaction. I am also watching the US dollar for resolution.

Roundup

Dust settling on the FOMC meeting minutes. Will know by the end of today the true market reaction. But gold has consolidated beneath the next resistance level which I believe is promising for a breakout to the next level shown:

22aug20131Meanwhile I am unsure with US equities whether they can now rally as we move beyond the full moon and out of the lunar negative period, or whether the continued downtrend in geomagnetism together with a lack of bottoming out in sentiment and oversold (as suggested by Chris Puplava below) mean they have yet further to fall. If I could suggest a middle ground it would be that they muster a rally and then fall again in a kind of ABC correction.

22aug20132Source: PFS Group

For Japanese equities, this is the picture:

22aug20134

I suggest it is also unclear. Either equities could rally here out of the smaller descending wedge together with the longer term support, or they could break down lower than the June lows to make an overall ABC correction from the peak. I would feel more confident about the former option if leading and coincident data had not been so much worse this month than last. Still, I may yet act here, will see.

All the CB leading indicators are in for this month apart from Eurozone:

22aug20133

Source: Conference Board

But combining German, French and Spanish readings, the Eurozone number is likely to be weaker than last month’s 0.5 but still positive. The stand out is China, with a rise to 1.4%, and this is echoed in the latest flash PMI reading, a sharp improvement:

22aug20135Source: Markit

This bodes well for commodities.

The latest picture for narrow real money as a leading indicator suggests that economic momentum will top out in October / November and begin to fade at end-2013, according to Simon Ward:

22aug20136Source: MoneyMovesMarkets

This would fit well with a scenario of stocks completing their topping process in the Autumn and commodities accelerating to a peak after stocks. It has been historically normal for stocks to peak ahead of the economy (once leading indicators are trending down) and for commodities to peak last once the economy has already dropped into a downtrend.

My last chart is courtesy of Megane Faber showing trends in CAPE valuations of all the major countries, to which I have added the text of the demographic peaks:

22aug20137Underlying Source: Megane Faber

By my demographic work, CAPE and P/E valuations must be understood relative to demographics. A high valuation can and will go higher if the demographic trend is positive, and vice versa for low valuations. What we face now is an unprecedented downward pull in demographics from USA, China and Europe, i.e. a massive proportion of the world’s GDP. The obvious candidates for future CAPE spikes at this point would be Brazil and India, as they are both in the world’s top 10 biggest economies and have positive demographic trends. However, they would likely need to first grow into bigger more self-sustaining economies and, if that were possible, it will take time given it would take place against the collective downward pressure from the majors. In short, I don’t see a major CAPE spike on that chart coming for some time.

Macro And Markets

It’s the start of the lunar negative fortnight today. I think this lunar downward pressure can be realised in price action in US equities, for these reasons.

1. Bonds may put in a rally here. Yields look to be arching over.

8aug20131Source: Sentimentrader

2. Rydex equities involvement and sentiment at contrarian levels:

8aug20133

Source: Sentimentrader

3. Diverging bullish percent over call put ratio – note the previous occurences here:

8aug20134Source: Stockcharts

4. Breadth divergence. There are a few indicators showing this such as % stocks above 50MA, Mclellan Summation index, and, here, advance-declines (making a double top versus the higher high in equity prices):

8aug20135Source: Cobra

No devastating decline in overall market internals. but enough to warrant a pullback. Countering this, the latest economic surprises, service PMI and manufacturing PMI, and overall earnings beat rate for the US have all been good. For a cyclical stock market top, we would need to start seeing some degradation in such data. However, if this is a topping process, then I expect we are only in the middle of it at this point, with a last push up to come ahead into September (assuming a decline can be realised over the next 2 weeks). By September I would then expect to see some macro reasons emerging to complete a topping process in equities.

I have doubled my short position on the Dow today and have specifically tallked about and targeted US equities because of the current divergence around the globe. The latest Markit PMIs really showed a vast difference between emerging and developed economies. Sober Look suggests this spread in economic cycle positioning:

8aug20137

Source: SoberLook

UK and Eurozone are looking particularly impressive and USA ticking along nicely. Australia has suffered since China lost momentum, and its central bank reduced rates again this week. This is the collective picture for the major central banks:

8aug20136

Source: Action Forex

Despite the QE tapering talk in the US, the graphic shows that we are still in an era of easing, with interest rate reduction still being pursued. As you know, I believe demographic trends are the source of the global economic weakness, ensuring we will be in an era of negligible rates for some time. Maybe the Fed will start to taper as early as next month, but I believe an end to QE and a renewed rate-increase policy will not be seen soon.

So, China has cracked, in my opinion, since its demographic trends reversed circa 2010. Those developing nations that boomed directly as China partners and those commodity-economies that benefitted from the long rising trends in commodity prices (through China demand) are currently suffering. This would include Brazil and Russia. India’s issues have been more internal and it needs reforms to help realise its demographic potential.

For most of the 2000s, this China plus emerging markets story was the fuel for the global economy, but now we are looking back towards the developed world to take the batton. Unfortunately, the US and Europe have significant demographic headwinds. I therefore don’t believe that we are now going to see sustained growth in the West. I continue to believe that either another rally in commodities will tip the world into a global recession, or the world is heading that way in a deflationary trend.

And that remains the key question for my account. Will my commodities longs prosper, or continue to sink? Right now, the commodities indices are potentially carving out a higher low than late June, which could spell an end to their downtrend. I believe this is the time for that to occur, because of my belief that equities are in a topping process. Historically they should now outperform and largely act as late cyclicals. I see this next month as critical for commodities. If they cannot make a higher low than June at this point, paricularly as the USD weakens, then it would look bearish for commodities.

Here is corn, showing a potential rally set up.

8aug20132Source: Sentimentrader

And copper looks to be breaking out following a month-long basing pattern.

To draw the above themes together, can emerging markets strengthen into year-end, positively-infected by current developed economy performance? If so, the commodities rally would appear more likely. If on the other hand developed markets begin to join emerging economies in weakness, then a deflationary downdraft would be more likely. The wildcards remain the solar cycle (if the peak is ahead, then a speculative push in commodities could occur with increased geopolitical conflict an associated input) and climate (drought, flood and very high historical temperatures remain very much in play – it depends whether we see a devastating coming-together at the critical time and global location for agricultural crops).

OECD leading indicators just released today are more supportive to the first scenario of emerging markets strengthening and joining developed nations, with Russia stabilising and India improving:

8aug20138

8aug20139Source: OECD

Roundup

This is the latest geomagnetism forecast versus the SP500. The forecast extends to the beginning of September and as can be seen has further transformed from a downtrend to a sideways/up trend.

5aug1The SP500 notably diverged from the model throughout July, more so than other indices which have more closely tracked the model. The outperformance of the US stock indices has meant p/e valuation has now increased to make the US amongst the world’s more expensive:

5aug4Source: FT

Is this justified? Not by demographics. Here once again is my real US equities plus real US house prices model versus 3 demographic ratios for the US:

X1That model has edged further up now in mid-2013 as real equities are back at 2007 levels and real house prices have edged up a little more (though are still a long way from the real 2007 peak). Yet the 3 demographic trends call for the model to collapse once again, as in 2001 and 2008. What makes demographics more potent this time around is that China has joined Europe and the USA in an unprecedented collective downward demographic pressure.

If we take the best of the three demographic measures, middle to young, only, then this is how it looks:

5aug5Source: PFS Group

Is it possible that the 2014-15 bottom is near enough and that stocks have taken off already? Well that p/e10 now stands at around 25, having bottomed in early 2009. That would mean p/es bottomed out around 5-6 years before the M/Y ratio, whereas in 2000 and 1982 the two peaked and troughed at very similar times. In the  1960s there was more of a gap, with demographics topping out a few years before p/es, but note it was demographics rather than p/es first, and this is echoed in my demographic work on Japan and UK, namely that if there is any lag it is demographics changing course first. In short, another cyclical bear in US stocks still looks the most likely course to me, and this is further cemented when we draw in all demographics measures, demographic pressures in China and Europe, and other US market valuations such as the Q ratio.

However, current leading indicator data is still largely positive for the USA at the moment (e.g. latest Markit PMI), and Europe is showing renewed strength (Markit PMIs, Conference Board). In fact it is the demographic-positive markets such as Brazil which are showing particular weakness. So what’s going on? I suggest commodities have played a key role in this. Lower input prices have boosted the developed economies and stocks. Commodity-economies such as Brazil have suffered. If commodities can rally again and make a historically-normal late-cyclical peak after stocks have peaked then I suggest the demographically-challenged major economies won’t be able to handle the renewed input price pressure. I believe the weak global recovery will topple over if commodities, particularly oil, rise in a meaningful way again.

Here is 30 year treasury yields with CCI comodities index, world equities index and Euro-USD. Euro-USD and commodities could be in a new uptrend that began in early July, IF they can make a higher low here.

5aug6Source: Bloomberg

But too early to say anything more. For me, it remains a game of patience, waiting to see if commodities can start to outperform here. Gold and silver had a very up-and-down week last week. Oil has maintained its breakout but appears to be stalling.

I believe the solar cycle still has a key role to play in the fortunes of commodities. Here is the latest SIDC update which continues to show two possibilities. If the solar max was Feb 2012 then I suggest commodities peaked out in 2011. If this were the case then I don’t believe a new secular bull market in stocks is underway because as per my work secular actually is demographic and the major economy demographics don’t support a new secular bull. I rather expect a deflationary recession to come to pass in due course. If the solar max is ahead as per the second SIDC option then I believe we will see the historically normal late outperformance of commodities from here into 2014 and that will tip the world into recession.

5aug3

Source: SIDC

In the near term, I am looking at the window from tomorrow’s new moon through to Friday’s end-of-lunar-positive period to take profits on some equities longs and potentially add more short equities. I would like to see stocks advance further this week to do so.

All Round Update

I’m back. Here’s an updated look at the main pillars of my work.

First, demographics. The key overarching macro issue going forward, in my view, is whether the combined price-deflationary and asset-deflationary demographic trends now in place between US, Europe and China will tip the world into recession and deflation despite the best efforts of central banks. Someone else has picked up on the theme and produced this:

1aug1Source: Nakedcapitalism

I continue to look at leading indicators for evidence. There is no doubt central banks have some impact on behaviour in the economy and financial markets by deploying policies to discourage savings, cash and fixed income, and to encourage lending, risk-assets investment and spending. But is it enough to offset the demographics?

The latest data shows Europe strengthening (PMIs, economic surprises), USA possibly having peaked (ECRI, economic surprises), and the overall global economy potentially weakening towards late 2013 but not until then (narrow real money). This week’s US GDP release surprised to the upside for last quarter, however the upside surprise matched the retrospective reduction in the previous quarter’s data. Nonetheless, the overall global picture is still fairly ‘safe’. Europe’s relative strength ahead should bode well for the Euro v USD, and a relatively weakening USD should bode well for commodities, and if we are to see the normal late cyclical outperformance in commodities (once stocks peak) then we need leading indicators to at least hold up a little longer.

If the unprecedented coming together of demographic downtrends in US, China and Europe mean the global economy is heading for recession no matter what (given China has now peaked demographically), then I believe this will mean a severe nominal decline in equities, as central banks will be revealed as impotent, and panic will ensue. If we slip into global recession without the ‘agent’ of commodity price acceleration then I would expect the SP500 to complete an overall megaphone formation since 2000 with a potentially lower low than 2009.

Next, solar cycles. Experts still don’t know if a solar peak is ahead or behind. Here’s the latest sunspot chart:

A2

It’s clearly a weak sunspot cycle, and fairly messy. Some scientists believe there is a second peak ahead this year, which may exceed the existing smoothed max (Feb 2012). On the other hand, an overlay of SC5 suggests that existing peak may have been it:

1aug2Source: WattsUpWithThat

If the peak was Feb 2012, then I would point to 2011’s commodities speculation including a silver parabolic together with extensive Arab revolutions as normal behaviour patterns associated with solar maxima. It should mean that we have passed the speculative peak in commodities, that global temperature may have already peaked, and that we should expect the geomagnetic disturbance peak that follows a solar max normally 1-3 years later and is associated with recession. In this scenario I would expect commodities to continue overall weakness and deflationary recession to occur.

If the peak is still ahead later this year then we may see global temperature hitting extremes and more geopolitical trouble, together with a speculative peak. All three could push up commodities in a late cyclical outperformance into 2014 with bonds already having topped and stocks topping this mid-year. In this scenario I would expect an inflationary spike to help tip the global economy into subsequent recession.

Next, geomagnetism. All models have been updated for this week, and drawing in the next 3 weeks geomagnetism forecast, we see this (mapped against the commodities index):

1aug3A flattening out in cumulative geomagnetism in August following a downtrend May-July. By normal seasonality, geomagnetism should be troubling again by September and October. August-September would therefore be a suitable time for US equities to make a final peak in a topping process, if one began in May. Did one?

Well, so far the process is developing like a typical top. A marginally higher high is currently being played out with some weakening in breadth versus the May peak (% stocks above 50MA, Mclellan summation index). Margin debt still looks like it peaked in April, and in 2000 and 2007 this peaked 3-6 months before the stock market finally rolled over. However, this would all be invalidated if stocks push on again here and away from the topping range, with breadth strengthening again. US earnings may play a role in this and so far have made an impressive earnings beat, but a poor revenue beat rate. This means companies are making profits by cutting costs. This could be a warning if the economy shows signs of weakening, which brings us back to the importance of leading indicator readings as they come out. If central banks have been able to juice the economy just enough to offset demographics, through rate cuts, QE and verbal support (do what ever it takes) then it is feasible that this already long cyclical bull (by historical comparisons) continues. But I side with the multi-month topping process currently playing out until counter-evidence increases.

Next, lunar phasing. I have updated The Lunar Edge page and this is how the two of the most ‘sensitive’ indices to lunar phasing have performed so far this year:

LE43 LE23

The German Dax has delivered all of its annual gains so far within the lunar positive fortnights (4 days after full moon through to 4 days after new moon), whereas the Singapore Straits has really delivered no lunar edge of any note so far this year. Nonetheless, a strategy playing the lunar edge equally across both would still have returned well overall. I continue to look to the start of lunar negative periods for adding short and to the start of lunar positive periods for adding long, in order to time my longer term trades. On that note, the current lunar positive period ends by Friday next week. If equities have been able to rise further by then, I will look at taking profits where in profit, and adding short at that point if evidence continues to support a topping process.

Because we are in a lunar positive period currently, and Japanese equities fulfilled what I last suggested look liked occurring (the arching-over turning into falls) I have entered long Nikkei again, but just a starter position. My main exposure currently remains long commodities, with greatest weighting precious metals. I have various significant loss-making positions in commodities. I continue to believe that because of demographic trends precious metals will come again as the anti-demographic. I suggest central banks in US, China and Europe will continue to have to support the economy for some time to come and that renewed dovish talk will benefit gold. For other commodities, I return to the solar maximum unknown. If the solar maximum is ahead still, then I believe temperature and geopolitical disturbance and speculative mania can inspire a historically normal commodities peak following a peak in equities. Crude oil’s breakout in June gave this more credibility. Crude has now pulled back a little, and it will be important to see if this is consolidation before further gains.

If commodities as a whole have peaked and deflation continues to press them downwards, then I will be holding increasing loss-making positions. What to do? I will be looking to average down and time mean reversion. Nothing goes down in a straight line and I will be looking to convert them into winning trades in a ‘trade your way out’ style by leveraging up. Not easy, and no doubt some would view that as too risky, but that’s what I will be doing. Don’t follow me, etc, I’m just sharing with you what I’m doing, as the money management is as important as the analysis, right? But first, let’s see if commodities can outperform in the rest of 2013, as the previously detailed evidence suggests is possible. I want to give them a little more time to gather momentum, before using aggression.

Some key assets. Gold reached important resistance around 1344. Can it break through? If not then the basing process in precious metals will need some time longer. It is confidence restoration versus short squeeze, but if the latter is to occur then we will need triggers in the news. The US dollar has been in decline since the Fed backtracked on QE-tapering-hastiness, turned away at key long term resistance. However, it could yet be consolidation before another charge. I believe it will weaken as the Eurozone relatively improves, but the Fed’s actions will play a key role. Since I sold out of short-treasuries they tracked overall sideways. This could be consolidation before further rises in yields, but as there has been no pullback I don’t wish to yet rejoin.

I am writing this post US GDP release and pre FOMC output. Both market movers, and it will take until tomorrow for the dust to settle and we see where different assets want to go. But I wanted to get the post out as my trip gave me no opportunity. Thanks for your comments and emails whilst I have been away.